DP
By abiodunbalo • 12th Feb 2019 • 24 views • 3 comments

LAGOS – The Lagos division of the Appeal Court, has set aside judgment of a Federal High Court sitting in Lagos against the Chairman of First Bank Nigeria Plc, Pastor Ibukun Awosika, and the bank’s Managing Director, Dr. Adesola Adeduntan, for contempt over judgment debt of N17 billion.

The appellate court set aside the decision of the Federal High Court on the grounds that the lower court judge erred in law when it convicted the bank bosses for contempt premised on the allegation of breach of an undertaking.

Justice Ibrahim Buba of the Federal High Court in Lagos had on June 16 found Awosika and Adeduntan guilty of refusal of the bank to release N17 billion plus interests that First Bank allegedly guaranteed to pay the community on behalf of Shell Petroleum Development Company (SPDC) of Nigeria Limited in respect of the judgment debt against SPDC in an oil spill suit filed by the community.

While delivering his judgment, he sentenced the duo to three months’ imprisonment but however suspended action till September 6, 2018 to enable the bank and its officials to purge themselves of the contempt.

The judge in the judgment ordered First Bank Plc to pay Ejama-Ebubu community of Ogoni in Rivers State the sum of N17 billion bond guaranteed by the bank on behalf of Shell Petroleum Development Company Limited (SPDC). But First Bank Plc refused to obey the order of the court forcing Justice Ibrahim Buba to commit the 1st to 3 defendants to jail for contempt.

Ten indigenes of Ejama community in Ogoniland, had through their counsel, Lucius Nwosu (SAN) sued Royal Dutch Shell Plc, Netherlands; Royal Dutch Shell Plc, United Kingdom; and SPDC over alleged oil spills that occurred when Shell operated in the community at the Federal High Court in Port Harcourt.

The bank chiefs who were dissatisfied with the Federal High Court judgment, through their counsel led by Chief Wole Olanipekun (SAN) filed an appeal.

At the Appellate court, the bank chiefs had asked the court to set aside the decision of the High Court on diverse grounds, which include that the lower court erred in law, acted without jurisdiction and reached a perverse decision when it granted the respondents’ motion on notice for committal of the appellants for contempt in respect of the Order of Court dated August 5, 2010 in suit No: FHC/PH/CS231/2001.

According to the Notice of Appeal, the said Order of August 5, 2010 was not made against the appellants (Awosika and Adeduntan), adding that the appellants were never parties to the suit in which the order was made neither did order mandated the appellants to perform any act

The appellants submitted that the learned trial judge erred in law and acted without jurisdiction when he heard and determined the contempt application dated March 19, 2018, adding that the judge lacked the jurisdiction to commit the appellants for alleged Ex-Facie Contempt of the Order he had made.

The appellants also contended that the lower court erred in law and reached a perverse decision when it convicted the appellants for contempt of court and imposed a prison sentence without taking oral evidence of witnesses.

The appellants submitted that the respondents as complainants before the lower court did not call oral evidence; the lower court did not hear any oral evidence and the criminal allegation of contempt of court was not proved beyond reasonable doubt before proceeding to commit the appellants for contempt and imposing a sentence.

The appellants also contended that the lower court erred in law and breached appellants’ right to fair hearing when it convicted and sentenced the appellants to term of imprisonment in their absence, adding that the presence of the appellants is mandatory for conviction.

The appellants therefore asked the court to dismiss, strike out the respondents’ motion dated March 19, 2018, strike out the Suit No: FHC/L/NRJ/1/2018 and make an order discharging and acquitting the appellants from the committal and sentence imposed by the lower court in its decision of June 6, 2018.

The Court of Appeal in a lead judgment by Hon. Justice J.Y. Tukur last Friday, therefore set aside Justice Buba’s decision, which convicted the bank chiefs.


3 Replies | Last update 12th Feb 2019 | Last comment

Requires Login

Make Money

Make Money

Make Money

Make Money





Ad1

Quick View User Earnings

Requires Login Login To View Earnings



Loading...