Onnoghen reacts as EFCC files fresh charges against him before NJC
Embattled CJN Walter Onnoghen has reacted to the fresh corruption charges against him by the EFCC-
The anti-graft agency, in its petition against Onnoghen before the NJC, had alleged that money found in the CJN's account was proceed of corruption- In reaction, Onnoghen said the monies were gifts he received from well-wishers during his daughter's wedding
The embattled chief justice of Nigeria, Walter Samuel Onnoghen, has issued a rebuttal to the fresh allegation of corruption filed against him by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) before the Nigerian Judiciary Council.
Onnoghen, who has found himself in the eye of storm after being indicted by the federal government over alleged failure to comply with law in the declaration of his assets, described the EFCC petition as mischievous and spurious.
According to him, the monies found in his bank accounts were not proceeds of corruption but the monetary gift he received during his daughter's wedding ceremony, Sahara Reporters reports.
Legit.ng recalls that the anti-graft commission, in a petition filed before the National Judicial Council (NJC) at its sitting on Wednesday, April3, alleged that Onnoghen received money in hisaccount in 2015.
EFCC further alleged that the money was paid to influence the cases before the Supreme Court since as at the time Onnoghen was on the Supreme Court panel.
Reacting to the allegation in an address, Onnoghen's counsels said : "In his evidence-In-chief, the respondent explained that the giftswere made at a time of the marriage ceremony of his first daughter, Oremini Nkanu Onnoghen who got married sometime in 2015."
It was not solicited and remains a part and parcel of the customs and traditions of the people.
His Lordship tendered a copy of the wedding invitation which was admitted in evidence without objection by the petitioner as Exhibit R9.“
The panel will observe that all the gifts of N250,000, N350,000, N250,000, N300,000 and N100,000 respectively were made within the period of the wedding shown in exhibit R9.
From the evidence of the petitioner/prosecution itself, there were no other payments made by those persons or by any other lawyer into the account of the Respondent prior to or after the said period of the wedding of the daughter."
Onnghen's counsel also argued that the gifts had nothing to do with the suspended CJN performing his duty as a judicial officer.